new england journal of medicine wikipedia

#NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE WIKIPEDIA PROFESSIONAL#

The following methods were used in the study: isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow of cattle culturing of isolated cells and obtaining a conditioned medium containing exometabolites with subsequent purification modeling of secondary immunodeficiency in mice setting up a test on mice to determine the number of antibody-forming cells in the spleen and hemagglutinin titers in blood serum statistical data analysis.

#NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE WIKIPEDIA PROFESSIONAL#

Lack of volunteers, in particular, experts, and inadequate support from professional institutions, are identified as main reasons for problems in Wikipedia's quality. Conversely, the study reveals the need for more experts to engage with Wikipedia.

Many are medical professionals, and their significant involvement helps to explain the above-average quality of Wikipedia medical topics. The findings also show that Wikipedia volunteers who edit medical topics are older, more gender-balanced, and better educated than typical Wikipedia volunteers from a decade ago. It highlights the importance of the non-traditional VFI dimensions of 'fun' and 'ideology' which have not been adequately discussed in the context of medical volunteering. It employs the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) model to study volunteers' motivations through a survey carried out in 2021 (N=74). The following paper advances our understanding of online volunteering in the medical context, through the study of Wikipedia volunteers who edit medical topics.

New england journal of medicine wikipedia